Dr. Lal & Jain Solutions for Chapter: Deductive Logic, Exercise 1: Exercise
Dr. Lal & Jain Reasoning Solutions for Exercise - Dr. Lal & Jain Solutions for Chapter: Deductive Logic, Exercise 1: Exercise
Attempt the practice questions on Chapter 9: Deductive Logic, Exercise 1: Exercise with hints and solutions to strengthen your understanding. Mental Ability Tests solutions are prepared by Experienced Embibe Experts.
Questions from Dr. Lal & Jain Solutions for Chapter: Deductive Logic, Exercise 1: Exercise with Hints & Solutions
In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.
Statements:
No king is a beggar.
All labourers are kings.
Conclusions:
I. No beggar is a labourer.
II. Some kings are labourers.
III. No labourer is a beggar.
IV. No king is a labourer.
In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.
Statements:
No Rajput is a milkman.
All businessmen are milkmen.
Conclusions:
I. No milkman is a businessman.
II. Some businessmen are not milkmen.
III. All Rajputs are milkmen.
IV. No Rajput is a businessman.
In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which of the conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.
Statements:
No orange is a pomegranate.
All oranges are apples.
Conclusions:
I. No pomegranate is an apple.
II. No apple is a pomegranate.
III. Some oranges are not apples.
IV. No pomegranate is an orange.
In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which of the conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.
Statements:
No king is a student.
All students are boys.
Conclusions:
No boy is a king.
No student is a king.
Some boys are students.
Some boys are kings.
If the given statement — "All poor people are not beggars" is taken to be true, which one of the following statements can be completely true?
In the following question two statements are given and four conclusions are given as options. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.
If the given statement—"Some gentle people are not bad saint" is taken to be true, which one of the following statements can be completely true?
In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions I, II, III and IV are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.
Statements:
Some sages are saints.
Some saints are beggars.
Some kings are beggars.
Conclusions:
I. Some saints are sages.
II. Some beggars are saints.
III. Some beggars are kings.
IV. Some kings are sages.
If the given statement—"All mangoes are tamarinds" is taken to be true, which one of the following statements will be completely true ?
