R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Exercise 1: Exercise
R. S. Aggarwal Reasoning Solutions for Exercise - R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Exercise 1: Exercise
Attempt the free practice questions from Exercise 1: Exercise with hints and solutions to strengthen your understanding. A Modern Approach to Verbal and Non-Verbal Reasoning solutions are prepared by Experienced Embibe Experts.
Questions from R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Exercise 1: Exercise with Hints & Solutions
Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered and . You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. Give answer as:
Statement: Should the educated unemployed youth be paid "unemployment allowance" by the Government?
Arguments: Yes. It will provide them some monetary help to either seek employment or to kick start some 'self-employment' venture.
No. It will dampen their urge to do something to earn their livelihood and thus promote idleness among the unemployed youth.

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered and . You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. Give answer as:
Statement: Should all the practicing doctors be brought under Government control so that they get salary from the Government and treat patients free of cost?
Arguments: No. How can any country do such an undemocratic thing?
Yes. Despite many problems, it will certainly help minimize, if not eradicate, unethical medical practices.

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered and . You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. Give answer as:
Statement: Should there be concentration of foreign investment in only few states?
Arguments: No. It is against the policy of overall development of the country.
Yes. A large number of states lack infrastructure to attract foreign investment.

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered and . You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. Give answer as:
Statement: Should India engage into a dialogue with neighbouring countries to stop cross border tension?
Arguments: Yes, This is the way to reduce the cross border terrorism and stop loss of innocent lives.
No, Neighbouring countries cannot be relied upon in such matters, they may still engage in subversive activities.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement:
Should a total ban be put on trapping wild animals?
Arguments:
I. Yes, trappers are making a lot of money.
II. No, bans on hunting and trapping are not effective.

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered and . You have to decide which of the arguments a 'strong' argument is and which a 'weak' argument is. Give answer as:
Statement: Should system of offering jobs only to the wards of government employees be introduced in all government offices in India?
Arguments: No. It denies opportunity to many deserving individuals and government may stand to lose in the long run.
No. It is against the principle of equality. Does not government owe its responsibility to all its citizens?

Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should we scrap the system of formal education beyond graduation?
Arguments: I. No. Our need is 'bread' for everyone, we cannot follow western models.
II. Yes. We cannot compete in the international market without equipping our children with computers.

Statement: Should all the legislators be forced to resign from their profession?Each question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Arguments: I. Yes. They will be able to devote more time for the country.
II. No. Nobody will contest election.
