In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: The laws and statutes framed by the Government for the purpose of providing equal treatment to every citizen, on implementation perpetuate the corrupt working system.

Conclusions:

I. The laws and statutes should be framed, but they should not be implemented to avoid a corrupt working system.

II. There should be an obvious method to investigate the corrupt working system.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: Mrs. X is nominated for one of two posts, of which one post is reserved by the Managing Committee for the females belonging to other religious minority communities and the other for the females of Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes.

Conclusions:

I. Mrs. X is a member of a religious minority community.

II. Mrs. X is a member of Scheduled Castes or Scheduled Tribes.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: We do not need today in India extraordinary specialists but those trained ordinary doctors who are dedicated to their profession.

Conclusions:

I. We should promote the medical profession with dedicated ordinary doctors rather than promoting highly-specialised medical education.

II. Extraordinary specialists are not dedicated to their profession.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: Many people and media alleged that Mr. X, the opposition leader, met the Chief Minister yesterday to seek certain favours, an allegation which was strongly rejected by Mr. X.

Conclusions:

I. Mr. X met the Chief Minister yesterday to seek certain favours.

II. Mr. X did not meet the Chief Minister to seek certain favours.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: For over three decades, company X has been totally involved in energy conservation, its efficient use, and management.

Conclusions:

I. The company has yet to learn and acquire basic things in this area.

II. It is dedication that is more important than knowledge and expertise.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: This book Z is the only book which focuses its attention on the problem of poverty in India between 1950 and 1980.

Conclusions:

I. There was no question of poverty before 1950.

II. No other books deal with poverty in India from 1950 to 1980.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: Applications of applicants who do not fulfil eligibility criteria and/or who do not submit applications before the last date will be summarily rejected, and they will not be called for the written test.

Conclusions:

I. Those who are called for the written test are those who fulfil the eligibility criteria and have submitted their applications before the last date.

II. The written test will be held only after scrutiny of the applications.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: In a one-day cricket match, the total runs made by a team were 200. Out of these, 160 runs were made by spinners.

Conclusions:

I. 80% of the team consists of spinners.

II. The opening batsmen were spinners.

In the following question is given a statement followed by two conclusions numbered I and II. You have to assume everything in the statement to be true, and then consider the two conclusions together and decide which of them logically follows beyond a reasonable doubt from the information given in the statement.

Statement: The old order changed, yielding place to new.

Conclusions:

I. Change is the law of nature.

II. Discard old ideas because they are old.