In the question given below, there are two statements followed by two conclusions, numbered I and II. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statement: Some books are pens. No pen is a pencil.

Conclusions:

I. Some books are pencils.

II. No book is a pencil.

In the question given below, there are two statements followed by four conclusions, numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: All terrorists are guilty. All terrorists are criminals.

I. Either all criminals are guilty or all guilty persons are criminals.

II. Some guilty persons are criminals.

III. Generally, criminals are guilty.

IV. Crime and guilt go together.

In the question given below, there are two statements followed by four conclusions, numbered I, II, III and IV. You have to take the given two statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance from commonly known facts. Read the conclusions, and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follow from the two given statements, disregarding commonly known facts.

Statements: Some books are pens. No pen is a pencil.

Conclusions:

I. Some pens are books.
II. Some pencils are books.
III. Some books are not pencils.
IV. All pencils are books.

The question given below consists of two statements P and Q. They may look factually absurd. You have to ignore this absurdity and concentrate only upon the logic involved therein.

P: Some musicians are not rich. All musicians are polite. Therefore, not all polite persons are rich.

Q: All musicians are rich. No rich person is polite. Therefore, musicians are not polite.

The question given below has a set of four statements. Each set of statements is further divided into three segments. Choose the alternative where the third segment in the statement can be logically deduced using both the preceding two, but not just from one of them.

A: X is an actor. Some actors are pretty. X is pretty.

B: Some men are cops. All cops are brave. Some brave people are cops.

C: All actors are brave. Some men are actors. Some men are brave.

D: All actors are pretty. X is not an actor. X is not pretty.

The question given below consists of six statements, followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument containing logically related statements, i.e. where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

A: Some pots are not vases.

B: Some vases are not pots.

C: No table is a vase.

D: All vases are tables.

E: Some vases are pots.

F: Some tables are not pots.

The question given below consists of six statements, followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument containing logically related statements, i.e. where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

A: All that is honest is not monetary.

B: Some providential things are xylophones.

C: No xylophone is providential.

D: All that is honest is monetary.

E: No honest thing is providential.

F: All honest things are xylophones.

The question given below consists of five statements, followed by options consisting of three statements put together in a specific order. Choose the option which indicates a valid argument containing logically related statements, i.e. where the third statement is a conclusion drawn from the preceding two statements.

A: MBAs are in great demand.

B: Shashi and Mansi are in great demand.

C: Shashi is in great demand.

D: Mansi is in great demand.

E: Shashi and Mansi are MBAs.

The question below is based on a set of given propositions I to IV. Select the best answer.

I: All P are Q.

II: Some P are not Q.

III: Some, but not all, P are Q.

IV: No P is Q.

Which of the following correctly describes the relationships among the above statements?