The exodus from the rural areas to the urban hubs in search of job opportunities has now declined to nearly twenty-six percent of what it was at the turn of the 21st century.

(1) Since the last decade, the rural economy has transformed itself into bankableh, profit-making, and commercially viable ventures.

(2) Job opportunities differ in urban and rural areas.

(3) The load on infrastructure and resources in urban areas which had remained unmanageable for a long time has been eased a little since the last decade.

(4) This trend of reverse migration which was seen only in developed countries till now has entered the scenes of developing nations as well.

(5) According to a recent report, more than eighty percent of the professionals having roots in rural areas prefer to work in urban cities rather than their home villages.

Which of the statements numbered (1), (2), (3), (4) and (5) mentioned above represents an effect of the given information most appropriately?

The exodus from the rural areas to the urban hubs in search of job opportunities has now declined to nearly twenty-six percent of what it was at the turn of the 21st century.

(1) Since the last decade, the rural economy has transformed itself into a bankable, profit-making and commercially viable venture.

(2) Job opportunities differ in urban and rural areas.

(3) The load on infrastructure and resources in urban areas which had remained unmanageable for a long time has been eased a little since the last decade.

(4) This trend of reverse migration which was seen only in developed countries till now has entered the scenes of developing nations as well.

(5) According to a recent report, more than eighty percent of the professionals having roots in rural areas prefer to work in urban cities rather than their home villages.

The exodus from the rural areas to the urban hubs in search of job opportunities has now declined to nearly twenty-six percent of what it was at the turn of the 21st century.

(1) Since the last decade, the rural economy has transformed itself into a bankable, profit-making, and commercially viable venture.

(2) Job opportunities differ in urban and rural areas.

(3) The load on infrastructure and resources in urban areas which had remained unmanageable for a long time has been eased a little since the last decade.

(4) This trend of reverse migration which was seen only in developed countries till now has entered the scenes of developing nations as well.

(5) According to a recent report, more than eighty percent of the professionals having roots in rural areas prefer to work in urban cities rather than their home villages.

The exodus from the rural areas to the urban hubs in search of job opportunities has now declined to nearly twenty-six percent of what it was at the turn of the 21st century.

(1) Since the last decade, the rural economy has transformed itself into a bankable, profit-making and commercially viable venture.

(2) Job opportunities differ in urban and rural areas.

(3) The load on infrastructure and resources in urban areas which had remained unmanageable for a long time has been eased a little since the last decade.

(4) This trend of reverse migration which was seen only in developed countries till now has entered the scenes of developing nations as well.

(5) According to a recent report, more than eighty percent of the professionals having roots in rural areas prefer to work in urban cities rather than their home villages.

Below is given a passage, followed by several possible inferences that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

Privatization is no panacea when it comes to education. Nor can high-cost intervention at the tertiary stage produce quality talent. The backbone of quality education is primary schooling. And improving that is not just a question of funding. The government has taken some steps to improve the situation by increasing the percentage of allocation in the budget. But it has done precious little to increase the efficacy of public spending in education. For that is a political and administrative task. Teachers who do not turn up to teach at rural schools (absenteeism is about 30% according to one estimate) and teachers who are not equipped or motivated to teach but continue in service with challenges are part of India's socio-political reality.

Quality of education is ensured in all the privately run educational institutions in India.

Below is given a passage, followed by several possible inferences that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

Privatization is no panacea when it comes to education. Nor can high-cost intervention at the tertiary stage produce quality talent. The backbone of quality education is primary schooling. And improving that is not just a question of funding. The government has taken some steps to improve the situation by increasing the percentage of allocation in the budget. But it has done precious little to increase the efficacy of public spending in education. For that is a political and administrative task. Teachers who do not turn up to teach at rural schools (absenteeism is about 30% according to one estimate) and teachers who are not equipped or motivated to teach but continue in service with challenges are part of India's socio-political reality.

Motivating the primary school teachers and improving the attendance of these teachers, are major challenges in India.

Below is given a passage, followed by possible inference that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

Privatization is no panacea when it comes to education. Nor can high-cost intervention at the tertiary stage produce quality talent. The backbone of quality education is primary schooling. And improving that is not just a question of funding. The government has taken some steps to improve the situation by increasing the percentage of allocation in the budget. But it has done precious little to increase the efficacy of public spending in education. For that is a political and administrative task. Teachers who do not turn up to teach at rural schools (absenteeism is about 30% according to one estimate) and teachers who are not equipped or motivated to teach but continue in service with challenges are part of India's socio-political reality.

The Indian government has not done enough to improve the quality of secondary education.

Below is given a passage, followed by several possible inferences that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

Privatization is no panacea when it comes to education. Nor can high-cost intervention at the tertiary stage produce quality talent. The backbone of quality education is primary schooling. And improving that is not just a question of funding. The government has taken some steps to improve the situation by increasing the percentage of allocation in the budget. But it has done precious little to increase the efficacy of public spending in education. For that is a political and administrative task. Teachers who do not turn up to teach at rural schools (absenteeism is about 30% according to one estimate) and teachers who are not equipped or motivated to teach but continue in service with challenges are part of India's socio-political reality.

Allocating more funds in the budget for primary education will substantially improve the quality of education.

Below is given a passage, followed by several possible inferences that can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine each inference separately in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.

Privatisation is no panacea when it comes to education. Nor can high-cost intervention at the tertiary stage produce quality talent. The backbone of quality education is primary schooling. And improving that is not just a question of funding. The government has taken some steps to improve the situation by increasing the percentage of allocation in the budget. But it has done precious little to increase the efficacy of public spending in education. For that is a political and administrative task. Teachers who do not turn up to teach at rural schools (absenteeism is about 30% according to one estimate) and teachers who are not equipped or motivated to teach but continue in service with challenge are part of India’s socio-political reality.

The government has been unsuccessful in achieving the desired result in education.