HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
Earn 100

X rays of wavelength 8.50 pm are directed in the positive direction of an x-axis onto a target containing loosely bound electrons. For Compton scattering from one of those electrons, at an angle of 180°, what are (a) the Compton shift, (b) the corresponding change in photon energy, (c) the kinetic energy of the recoiling electron. and (d) the angle between the positive direction of the x-axis and the electron's direction of motion?

Important Questions on Photons and Matter Waves

HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
In an old-fashioned television set, electrons are accelerated through a potential difference of 25.0 kV. What is the de-Broglie wavelength of such electrons? (Relativity is not needed.)
HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT

Show that when a photon of energy E is scattered from a free electron at rest, the maximum kinetic energy of the recoiling electron is given by Kmax=E2E+mc22.

MEDIUM
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
Find the maximum kinetic energy of electrons ejected from a certain material if the material's work function is 2.3 eV and the frequency of the incident radiation is 2.5×1015Hz.
MEDIUM
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
Calculate the de Broglie wavelength of (a) a 1.00 keV electron, (b) a 1.00 keV photon, and (c) a 1.00 keV neutron.
MEDIUM
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
The existence of the atomic nucleus was discovered in 1911 Rutherford, who properly interpreted some experiments in which a beam of alpha particles was scattered from a metal foil of atoms such as gold. (a) If the alpha particles had a kinetic energy of 7.5 MeV, what was their de Broglie wavelength? (b) Explain whether the wave nature of the incident alpha particles should have been taken into account in interpreting these experiments. The mass of an alpha particles is 4.00 u (unified atomic mass units) and its distance of closest approach to the nuclear center in this experiment was about 30 fm. (The wave nature of matter was not postulated until more than a decade after these crucial experiments was first performed.)
HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT

Figure shows a case in which the momentum component px of a particle is fixed, so that, Δpx=0; then, from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, the position x of the particle is completely unknown. From the same principle, it follows that the opposite is also true, that is, if the position of a particle is exactly known (Δx=0), the uncertainty in its momentum is infinite.

Consider an intermediate case. In which the position of a particle is measured, not to infinite precision, but to within a distance of λ/2π, where λ is the particle's de Broglie wavelength. Show that the uncertainty in the (simultaneously measured) momentum component is then equal to the component itself; that is, Δpx=p. Under these circumstances, would a measured momentum of zero surprises you? What about a measured momentum of 0.5p? Of 2p? Of 12p?

Question Image

HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
The uncertainty in the position of an electron along the x-axis is given as 50 pm, which is about equal to the radius of a hydrogen atom. What is the least uncertainty in any simultaneous measurement of the momentum component px of this electron?
HARD
JEE Main
IMPORTANT
Suppose the fractional efficiency of a cesium surface(with work function 1.80 eV) is 1.0×10-16; that is, on average one electron is ejected for every 1016 photon that reaches the surface. What would be the current of electrons ejected from such a surface if it were illuminated with 600 nm light from a 3.00 mW laser and all the ejected electrons took part in the charge flow?