R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Chapter: Statement - Arguments, Exercise 1: EXERCISE
R. S. Aggarwal Reasoning Solutions for Exercise - R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Chapter: Statement - Arguments, Exercise 1: EXERCISE
Attempt the free practice questions on Chapter 2: Statement - Arguments, Exercise 1: EXERCISE with hints and solutions to strengthen your understanding. Logical Reasoning solutions are prepared by Experienced Embibe Experts.
Questions from R. S. Aggarwal Solutions for Chapter: Statement - Arguments, Exercise 1: EXERCISE with Hints & Solutions
The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should higher education be completely stopped for some time?
Arguments:
I. No. It will hamper the country's future progress.
II. Yes. It will reduce the educated unemployment.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should there be more than one High Court in each state in India?
Argument:
I. No. This will be sheer wastage of taxpayers' money.
II. Yes. This will help reduce the backlog of cases pending for a very long time.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should the judiciary be independent of the executive?
Arguments:
I. Yes. This would help curb the unlawful activities of the executive.
II. No. The executive would not be able to take bold measures.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should higher education be restricted to only those who can bear the expenditure?
Arguments:
I. Yes, Higher education is very costly, hence it should not be given free.
II. No, There are a large number of brilliant students who cannot afford to pay, and they should be given higher education.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Is buying things on installments profitable to the customer?
Arguments:
I. Yes. He has to pay less.
II. No. Paying installments upsets the family budget.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should all news be controlled by the government in a democracy?
Arguments:
I. Yes, Variety of news only confuses people.
II. No, Controlled news loses credibility.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should there be students’ union in college/university?
Arguments:
I. No. This will create a political atmosphere in the campus.
II. Yes. It is very necessary. Students are future political leaders.

The question given below consists of a statement, followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the argument is a 'strong' argument and which is a 'weak' argument.
Statement: Should all the legislators be forced to resign from their profession?
Arguments:
I. Yes. They will be able to devote more time to the country.
II. No. Nobody will contest the election.
