In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.

Statements:

All kings are clever.

Some foolish (persons) are kings.

Conclusions:

I. All foolish (persons) are clever.

II. Some foolish (persons) are clever.

III. Some clever (persons) are foolish.

IV. Some kings are foolish.

In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions I, II, III and IV are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.

Statements:

All pen are books.

Some pencils are not books.

Conclusions: 

I. Some pencils are not books.

II. Some books are not pencils.

III. Some books are pen.

IV. All pencils are pen.

In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions I, II, III and IV are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.

Statements:

All things are clad.

Some things are not odd.

Conclusions:

I. Some clad (objects) are things.

II. Some odds are not things.

III. Some odds are not clad.

IV. Some clad (objects) are not odd.

In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions I, II, III and IV are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.

Statements:

All horses are elephants.

Some elephants are not camels.

Conclusions:

I. Some elephants are horses.

II. Some camels are not elephants.

III. Some horses are not camels.

IV. Some elephants are not horses.

In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions I, II, III and IV are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion, even then you have to assume them as true. Then decide which conclusion on the basis of given statements is logically valid.

Statements:

All brinjals are ladyfingers.

No brinjal is potato.

Conclusions:

I. Some ladyfingers are brinjals.

II. Some ladyfingers are not brinjals.

III. No potato is brinjal.

IV. No potato is ladyfinger.

In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.

Statements:

All dancers are heroines.

No heroine is a villain actress.

Conclusions:

I. Some heroines are dancers.

II. No villain actress is a heroine.

III. All dancers are villain actresses.

IV. Some villain actresses are dancers.

In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.

Statements:
No king is a beggar.
All labourers are kings.

Conclusions:
I. No beggar is a labourer.
II. Some kings are labourers.
III. No labourer is a beggar.
IV. No king is a labourer.

In the following question, two statements are given, and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.

Statements:

No Rajput is a milkman.

All businessmen are milkmen.

Conclusions:

I. No milkman is a businessman.

II. Some businessmen are not milkmen.

III. All Rajputs are milkmen.

IV. No Rajput is a businessman.

In the following question, two statements are given and four conclusions- I, II, III and IV, are given under them. The given statements may be contrary to the universal opinion; even then you have to assume them as true. Decide which of the conclusion(s) is/are logically valid on the basis of the given statements.

Statements:
No orange is a pomegranate.
All oranges are apples.

Conclusions:
I. No pomegranate is an apple.
II. No apple is a pomegranate.
III. Some oranges are not apples.
IV. No pomegranate is an orange.