Statement - Arguments

The following question contains two statements- an assertion (A) and a reason (R). Mark your answer as per the codes provided below:

$1$. (A) is true but (R) is false.

$2$. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

$3$. Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

$4$. (A) is false but (R) is true.

Assertion (A): A parachute enables a person to descend safely from a height in case of an accident.

Reason (R): A parachute is made of a fabric with limited air permeability and has a very large frontal area. When it falls through the air, it experiences heavy air resistance. The forces of lift and drag due to the airflow balance the weight of the parachutist so that one descends at a constant slow speed.

The following question contains two statements- an assertion (A) and a reason (R). Mark your answer as per the codes provided below:

$1$. (A) is true but (R) is false.

$2$. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not the correct explanation of (A).

$3$. Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the correct explanation of (A).

$4$. (A) is false but (R) is true.

Assertion (A): Gandhiji withdrew the non-cooperation Movement against the British rule in India for some time.

Reason (R): Gandhiji believed in non-violence but protestations by people against the British rule at Chauri-Chaura turned violent. This event disappointed Gandhiji.

In the following question, select the related word from the given alternatives.

Car : Petrol :: Television : ?

Directions. Each of these questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a 'strong' arguments and which is a weak arguments.
Mark answer as
(1) if Only arguments I is strong.
(2) if only arguments II is strong.
(3) if either I or II is strong.
(4) if neither I nor II is strong.

Statement: Should military service be made compulsory in our country?
Arguments: I. No, It is against the policy of non-violence.
II. Yes, Every citizen should protect his country.

The question given below consists of a statement followed by two arguments numbered 1 and 2. You have to decide which argument(s) is/are implicit. 

Statement: Should powerful nations attack relatively weaker nations that pose a probable danger to world peace?
Arguments:
$1.$ Yes. War is justified for the noble purpose of peacekeeping.
$2.$ No. War/violence should never be resorted to.

A paragraph is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to read the given paragraph carefully and mark the answers accordingly. 

Powerful though the Himalayas are, the Himalayan ecosystem is fragile and vulnerable. The constant damming of rivers has not only polluted the Ganga itself, but has also gravely jeopardised the people living in the higher reaches. Despite constant warnings from scientists and concerned citizens, the blasting of roads and damming of rivers continues unabated. 

Arguments:
I. Persistent interference in the sensitive Himalayan terrain for development may have grave consequences.

II. Across the world, there is no building of roads or dams in eco-sensitive zones. 

A paragraph is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to read the given paragraph carefully and mark the answers accordingly. 

Indigenous languages have a localised existence. They are being overwhelmed by global markets and global economics. Mother tongues are gradually being dwarfed by globalisation. Their place is being usurped by foreign languages, which facilitate and guarantee successful trade and commerce and boost the economy.

Arguments:
I. Many countries have advocated learning two languages from the primary school level.

II. Indigenous languages must be safeguarded to preserve the heritage of world languages. 

A paragraph is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to read the given paragraph carefully and mark the answers accordingly. 

The Paris Agreement recognises the importance of natural resources in climate change mitigation and wants to adopt Nature-based solutions to promote ecological systems along with development.

Arguments:
I. Climate change presents one of the greatest challenges to mankind today. 

II. There has to be a balance between ecology and development as both are equally important. 
 

A paragraph is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to read the given paragraph carefully and mark the answers accordingly. 

With less than 150 days to go for the Tokyo Olympics, many countries are grappling with the question of where to place their athletes in the vaccination queue. According to the International Olympic Committee athletes and officials should get their vaccines before the Games.

Arguments:
I. The country organising the Olympics has made it mandatory for all participants to be vaccinated before the Games. 

II. Sportspersons represent a country while playing. 
 

Direction : Read the following information carefully and answer the question given below.

Statement: Should girls learn the art of Judo and Karate?

Arguments: 

(I) Yes, It will enable them to defend themselves from rogues and ruffians.

(II) No, They will lose their Feminine grace.

The telecom department in India is badly managed. $10$ years ago, a new installation of a telephone cost only Rs.$1,000$ and would take around $6$ months. Since then, the price has increased fivefold, with an actual increase in the time taken to regularize a new installation.
All the following would tend to weaken the conclusion of the argument above except:

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments . You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question . Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement:

Luxury hotels should be banned in India.

Arguments:

I. Yes, these places are turning into operating centers for international criminals.

II. No, all foreign tourists won't be able to find a suitable place to stay.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement:

Should the government shut down all government organizations to arrest the misuse of funds?

Arguments:

I. Yes. Public funds will be saved by shutting down government organizations.

II. No. Services from the government organizations cannot be handed over to the private institutions.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments . You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question . Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Which of the following statements weakens the above argument?

(A) Chocolates contain large number of antioxidants which slow the ageing process.

(B) It has been revealed that regular intake of chocolate increases thus lowering the chance of diabetes.

(C) Green leafy vegetables have substances which protect skin from UV rays.

(D) Chocolates have three types of fats, one of which increases the level of ‘bad cholesterol’.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement:

Should speed breakers be banned?

Arguments:

I. Yes, data shows that number of accidents increase after putting the speed breakers.

II. No, it teaches fast drivers a Sub-Topic.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement:
Would you eat rice even if you know that it will make you fat?
Arguments:
I: Yes, a complete abstinence from food will make me feel weak.
II: No, but since I work out a lot it hardly affects me.

In the question below is followed by a statement and some arguments. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer:

Statement:
Unsanctioned buildings in the city should be destroyed.
Arguments:
I. Yes, General public will realize that building of unsanctioned structures is illegal and will not construct them.
II. No, People might become homeless overnight.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments . You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question . Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement: Should the consumption of aerated drinks be banned in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this is the only way to reduce the risk of exposing people to some diseases.
II. No, each individual should have the right to choose what he wants.
III. No, there is no confirmed evidence that such products have adverse effects on human body.
IV. Yes, it is banned in many other countries also.

Each question below is followed by a statement and some arguments . You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question . Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. Select the correct answer using the codes given below.

Statement:
Should children aged between $5$ and $16$ be given compulsory education in India?
Arguments:
I. Yes, it is a rule and rules should be followed strictly by all.
II. No, each individual knows how to protect his/her own life and it should be left to his/her discretion.
III. No, it does not ensure prosperity as only a half of the educated persons get employment.
IV. Yes, it is necessary as education significantly improves a person’s quality of life.

Each question below is followed by a statement/ Question and arguments I and II. You have to decide which of the following arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. In making decisions about important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments and weak arguments so for as they relate to the question . Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. GIVE ANSWER (A) If only argument I is strong. (B) If only argument II is strong. (C) If both argument I and II are strong. (D) If neither argument I nor II is strong.

Statement: 
Should animal testing be banned?
Arguments:
I: Yes, some groups of people have less capacity for suffering than most
animals.
II: No, poor countries would be unable to afford independent research.